lunes, 24 de agosto de 2009


ZOOPHILIA OR BESTIALITY?
Zoophilia is a paraphilia defined as sexual attraction by a human to non-human animals. Human/animal sexual interaction is referred to as zoosexuality, or simply animal sex; the term bestiality is also used, especially in legal and negative contexts. The quite ambiguous term sodomy has also sometimes been used for bestiality. In pornography, zoosexuality is occasionally referred to as "farmsex".

Zoophilia is often considered to be unnatural, and zoosexuality has been condemned as animal abuse however, some such as philosopher pete singer argue that this is not inherently the case. Zoophilia is illegal in many jurisdictions.

Zoophilia in pornography

Involving zoosexuality is widely illegal, even in most countries where the act itself is not explicitly outlawed. In the United States, this pornography is automatically considered obscene and therefore may not be sold, mailed or imported (production and mere possession appear to be legal however). Similar restrictions obtain in Germany.

Materials featuring animal sex are widely available on the internet, however, mainly because their production and sale is legal in countries like the Netherlans and denmark.


Zoophilia in mythology

Zoophilia has been a frequent subject in art, literature, and fantasy. In Greek mythology, Zeus appeared to Leda in the form of a swan (resulting in the birth of Helen andpolydeuces), and the Minotaur was the offspring of Queen Pasiphae and a white bull. The god Pan has also been frequently associated with animal sex.


In my opinion Zoophilia is wrong. Gay guys give there partners a choice whether they want to have sex with them or not. Animals aren't given a choice and that is wrong to abuse the trust of a loving animal and possibly hurt them for your own pleasure.

2 comentarios:

  1. porque esta mal?
    y usar zapatillas de cuero esta bien?
    comer pollo frito esta bien?
    pero dejar que un perro se monte a su ama es cruel?
    te dejo una web para que mires
    http://zoofilia-y-bestialismo.blogspot.com/

    ResponderEliminar
  2. It is not bad at all. Other animals can and do consent, as lust and sexual pleasures are of basic mental origin where humans and other animals are very similarly wired. Some do abuse animals and they give rise to the name bestiality. Non abusive sexual contact whereas the lovers engage in mutual pleasure, often brought about by the non human species, is what I would consider to be zoophilia. I am a zoophile and have a heart for the sensual love that a lover of a different species can provide; it is unconditional and without constraint, sometimes soft and sensual and sometimes raw and wild-it has been the most rewarding experience I have ever had, making human sexual pleasures pale by comparison. It is no fun to try and force a different species to have sex because you either end up on the other side of the fence with bruises or bite marks, or you will find that they are not into it, but just letting you get it over with and that is not arousing to me at all. The sheer lust they can offer is so rewarding in and of itself that I can't even preform unless my lover actually solicits me in kind--it must build upon itself for there to be true pleasure. Therefore I am a zoophile and not a beastialist.

    ResponderEliminar